Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Redmi Note 14 5G: Which Mid-Range Phone Wins in India? (2025)
Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Redmi Note 14 5G: Camera, Performance, Battery & Price Comparison in India (2025)
Specification Comparison
| Specification | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Redmi Note 14 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price (Starting) | ₹23,999 (8GB/256GB) | ₹21,999 (6GB/128GB) |
| Launch Date | August 2024 | December 2024 |
| Dimensions | 154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1 mm | 160.2 x 74.6 x 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 190 g |
| Build | Glass front, vegan leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front/back, plastic frame |
| IP Rating | IP68 (water/dust resistant) | IP54 (splash resistant) |
| MIL-STD Certification | MIL-STD 810H | No |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) |
| Display Type | pOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Size | 6.67 inches | 6.67 inches |
| Display Resolution | 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Display Refresh Rate | 144Hz | 120Hz |
| Display Brightness | 2800 nits (peak) | 3000 nits (peak) |
| Display Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| HDR Support | HDR10+ | HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| PWM Dimming | 1920Hz | 1920Hz |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360Hz | 240Hz |
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2.5 GHz) | Octa-core (2.5 GHz) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| RAM Options | 8GB, 12GB (LPDDR4x) | 6GB, 8GB, 12GB (LPDDR4x) |
| Storage Options | 256GB, 512GB (UFS 2.2) | 128GB, 256GB (UFS 2.2) |
| Expandable Storage | No | Yes (up to 1TB via microSD) |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Software Updates | 3 years OS, 4 years security | 2 years OS, 3 years security |
| Main Camera | 50MP (f/1.8, OIS) | 108MP (f/1.7, OIS) |
| Ultrawide Camera | 13MP (f/2.2, 120° FOV) | 8MP (f/2.2, 112° FOV) |
| Telephoto Camera | 10MP (f/2.0, 3x optical zoom) | No |
| Main Camera Sensor | Sony LYTIA 700C | Unknown |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps |
| Front Camera | 32MP (f/2.4) | 16MP (f/2.4) |
| Front Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Battery Capacity | 4310mAh | 5100mAh |
| Charging Speed | 68W wired, 15W wireless | 45W wired |
| Wireless Charging | Yes | No |
| Charging Time (20-100%) | ~40 minutes | ~48 minutes |
| Fingerprint Sensor | In-display optical | In-display optical |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5mm Jack | No | No |
| 5G Bands | 12 bands | 10 bands |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6e | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Colors | Pantone Nautical Blue, Poinciana, Grisaille, Latte | Black, Blue, White |
| AnTuTu Score | ~800,000 | ~650,000 |
| Geekbench Single-Core | ~1030 | ~950 |
| Geekbench Multi-Core | ~2800 | ~2600 |
| 3DMark Wild Life | ~4500 | ~4000 |
| Design Feature | Vegan leather back, Pantone colors | Flat glass design |
| Additional Sensors | Gyro, proximity, compass | Gyro, proximity, compass |
| Box Contents | Charger, case, USB cable | Charger, USB cable |
| Weight Balance | Well-balanced | Top-heavy |
| Durability | Military-grade (MIL-STD 810H) | Standard |
| RAM Speed | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x |
| Storage Speed | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Display Pixel Density | ~446 ppi | ~395 ppi |
| Screen-to-Body Ratio | ~90% | ~89% |
| Camera Features | AI enhancements, night mode | HyperOS camera processing |
| Software Features | Moto Gestures, Smart Connect | HyperOS customization |
| Charging Port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Audio Codecs | aptX, LDAC | aptX |
| Haptic Feedback | Premium | Standard |
| Thermal Management | Good | Average |
| CPU Architecture | 4nm | 6nm |
| GPU Performance | Moderate | Moderate |
| Video Stabilization | EIS, OIS | EIS, OIS |
| Display Color Depth | 10-bit | 10-bit |
| Network Speed | 5G SA/NSA | 5G SA/NSA |
| Charging Adapter | 68W included | 45W included |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (5W) | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| IR Blaster | No | Yes |
| Notification LED | No | No |
| Button Placement | Right side | Right side |
| Weight Distribution | Even | Slightly uneven |
| Camera App | Moto Camera | HyperOS Camera |
| Software Bloatware | Minimal | Moderate |
| Display Curvature | Flat | Flat |
| Color Accuracy | High (DCI-P3 100%) | High (DCI-P3 100%) |
| Battery Efficiency | Good | Excellent |
| Audio Output | Dolby Atmos | Standard |
| Build Quality | Premium | Good |
| Thermal Throttling | Low | Moderate |
| Antenna Placement | Optimized | Standard |
| Camera Zoom | 3x optical | Digital only |
| OS Customization | Moderate | High |
| Display Calibration | Customizable | Standard |
| Privacy Features | Clipboard alerts, app permissions | Clipboard alerts, app permissions |
| Gaming Mode | Game Space | Game Turbo |
| Software Optimization | Excellent | Good |
| Low-Light Video | Good | Average |
| Portrait Mode | Accurate edge detection | Moderate edge detection |
| Selfie Quality | Sharp | Average |
| Durability Testing | Drop-resistant | Standard |
Real-Life Test Results
1. Performance and Gaming
Motorola Edge 50 Neo: The MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) delivers smooth performance for daily tasks like browsing, social media, and multitasking. In gaming tests with Genshin Impact and Call of Duty: Mobile, it achieves 45–50 fps on medium settings with minimal thermal throttling after 30 minutes (AnTuTu: ~800,000). The cleaner Android OS and optimization make it feel snappy. However, it’s not ideal for heavy gaming compared to Snapdragon-based rivals like the POCO F6.
[](https://www.91mobiles.com/hub/motorola-edge-50-neo-review/)Redmi Note 14 5G: Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra (6nm), it handles multitasking and daily tasks well, though slightly less fluid than the Edge 50 Neo (AnTuTu: ~650,000). Gaming performance is similar, with 40–45 fps in demanding titles on medium settings, but it shows more thermal throttling after 45 minutes. HyperOS adds minor bloatware, impacting responsiveness. Winner: Motorola Edge 50 Neo for smoother performance.
[](https://suprememobiles.in/blogs/mobiles/redmi-note-14-vs-motorola-edge-50-neo-comparison)2. Camera Performance
Daylight Photography:
- Motorola Edge 50 Neo: The 50MP Sony LYTIA 700C with OIS captures detailed images with vibrant colors and excellent dynamic range. The 13MP ultrawide offers decent quality with minimal distortion, and the 10MP telephoto (3x zoom) adds versatility for portraits. It outperforms rivals like the OnePlus Nord CE4 in color accuracy. [](https://www.91mobiles.com/hub/motorola-edge-50-neo-review/)
- Redmi Note 14 5G: The 108MP main camera produces sharp images with vivid colors, excelling in detail retention. However, the 8MP ultrawide has noticeable color shifts and softer edges. Lacking a telephoto lens, digital zoom up to 3x loses clarity. Winner: Motorola Edge 50 Neo for versatility and ultrawide quality. [](https://suprememobiles.in/blogs/mobiles/redmi-note-14-vs-motorola-edge-50-neo-comparison)
Low-Light Photography:
- Motorola Edge 50 Neo: Night mode delivers sharp, well-exposed images with balanced lighting and minimal noise. The telephoto lens aids low-light portraits, offering better bokeh than competitors.
- Redmi Note 14 5G: Night mode brightens scenes but introduces noise and a warm white balance, reducing detail clarity. It struggles with ambient light management. Winner: Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Portrait and Selfie:
- Motorola Edge 50 Neo: The 32MP selfie camera captures sharp images with accurate skin tones and strong edge detection in portraits. It handles bright conditions well.
- Redmi Note 14 5G: The 16MP selfie camera produces average results, with occasional overexposure and less precise edge detection. Winner: Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Video Recording:
- Motorola Edge 50 Neo: 4K@30fps videos are stable with good detail, though low-light videos show minor noise. OIS and EIS enhance smoothness.
- Redmi Note 14 5G: 4K@30fps videos are decent but less stable in low light, with average color balance. Winner: Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
3. Battery Life
Motorola Edge 50 Neo: The 4310mAh battery lasts ~13 hours in PCMark tests, supporting a full day of moderate use (browsing, streaming, light gaming). YouTube streaming consumes ~5% per hour, gaming ~22%. 68W charging takes ~40 minutes from 20–100%, and 15W wireless charging is a bonus.
[](https://www.91mobiles.com/hub/motorola-edge-50-neo-review/)Redmi Note 14 5G: The 5100mAh battery lasts ~15 hours in PCMark tests, offering nearly 1.5 days of moderate use. YouTube streaming consumes ~4% per hour, gaming ~20%. 45W charging takes ~48 minutes. Winner: Redmi Note 14 5G for battery life.
[](https://suprememobiles.in/blogs/mobiles/redmi-note-14-vs-motorola-edge-50-neo-comparison)4. Display and Multimedia
Motorola Edge 50 Neo: The 6.67-inch pOLED display (144Hz, 2800 nits) offers vibrant colors, high contrast, and smooth scrolling. It’s ideal for gaming and videos, with HDR10+ support. Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos deliver rich audio.
[](https://www.91mobiles.com/hub/motorola-edge-50-neo-review/)Redmi Note 14 5G: The 6.67-inch AMOLED display (120Hz, 3000 nits) is slightly brighter, excellent for outdoor use, and supports Dolby Vision. Stereo speakers provide good audio but lack Dolby Atmos depth. Winner: Redmi Note 14 5G for brightness, Motorola Edge 50 Neo for audio.
[](https://suprememobiles.in/blogs/mobiles/redmi-note-14-vs-motorola-edge-50-neo-comparison)5. Software Experience
Motorola Edge 50 Neo: Android 14 with a near-stock experience, minimal bloatware, and Moto Gestures (e.g., chop for flashlight) enhance usability. Offers 3 years of OS updates and 4 years of security patches.
[](https://www.91mobiles.com/hub/motorola-edge-50-neo-review/)Redmi Note 14 5G: HyperOS on Android 14 includes bloatware and ads, which can feel intrusive. Customization is high, but only 2 years of OS updates limit longevity. Winner: Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
[](https://suprememobiles.in/blogs/mobiles/redmi-note-14-vs-motorola-edge-50-neo-comparison)6. Design and Durability
Motorola Edge 50 Neo: The vegan leather back, Pantone colors, and IP68 rating with MIL-STD 810H certification ensure premium feel and durability. At 171g, it’s lightweight and comfortable.
[](https://www.91mobiles.com/hub/motorola-edge-50-neo-review/)Redmi Note 14 5G: The glass back and plastic frame feel good but less premium. IP54 offers basic splash resistance, and at 190g, it’s slightly top-heavy. Winner: Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
[](https://suprememobiles.in/blogs/mobiles/redmi-note-14-vs-motorola-edge-50-neo-comparison)7. Connectivity
Motorola Edge 50 Neo: Supports 12 5G bands, Wi-Fi 6e, and Bluetooth 5.3 for fast, reliable connections. NFC enables contactless payments.
Redmi Note 14 5G: Offers 10 5G bands, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth 5.3. Includes an IR blaster for remote control functionality. Winner: Tie (Motorola for 5G bands, Redmi for IR blaster).
Pros and Cons
Motorola Edge 50 Neo Pros
- Premium vegan leather design with Pantone colors
- IP68 and MIL-STD 810H durability
- Versatile camera with telephoto lens
- Smooth 144Hz pOLED display
- Clean Android 14 with longer updates (3+4 years)
- Wireless charging support
- Excellent performance optimization
Motorola Edge 50 Neo Cons
- Smaller 4310mAh battery
- Gorilla Glass 3 (older protection)
- Not ideal for heavy gaming
- No expandable storage
- Slightly higher price
Redmi Note 14 5G Pros
- Larger 5100mAh battery with longer life
- Brighter 3000-nit AMOLED with Dolby Vision
- 108MP main camera for sharp details
- Expandable storage up to 1TB
- IR blaster for remote control
- Lower starting price
Redmi Note 14 5G Cons
- Bloatware-heavy HyperOS
- Shorter software updates (2+3 years)
- No telephoto lens
- Lower resolution display
- Average low-light camera performance
Conclusion
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo and Redmi Note 14 5G are strong contenders in the ₹20,000–₹25,000 segment, each catering to different priorities. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo excels with its premium design, IP68 durability, versatile camera system (including telephoto), clean Android experience, and longer software support, making it ideal for users who value style, photography versatility, and software longevity. The Redmi Note 14 5G stands out with its larger battery, brighter AMOLED display, expandable storage, and lower price, appealing to budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and display quality.
Choose Motorola Edge 50 Neo if you want a premium, durable design, a versatile camera, and a near-stock Android experience with longer updates. Choose Redmi Note 14 5G if you need longer battery life, a brighter display, expandable storage, and a more affordable price. Both phones offer excellent value, but your choice depends on whether you prioritize design and software (Motorola) or battery and affordability (Redmi).
Post a Comment